How did I approach the project?
Creating a robust baseline
Upon arriving at the project, I began by analyzing the existing baseline schedule and progress updates, which revealed that the quality could be improved. I used these findings to develop a new, robust planning that would serve as the basis for further progress measurements and subsequent delay analyses. With this improved baseline, we could work with greater confidence, significantly enhancing the process for critical path analysis and performance. This provided a solid foundation for managing the time and scheduling aspects of the project.
Thorough Forensic Analysis
I conducted a forensic analysis of the delays incurred, which involved a comprehensive assessment of all scheduling documents, identifying the primary causes of delay, and mapping the consequences of these delays. A detailed report was prepared, describing each delay and its impact on the project milestones. This report distinguished between the responsible parties and outlined who was accountable for which overruns. It served as the basis for a formal Extension of Time claim.
Improving Communication and Transparency
In addition to the technical aspects, it was also crucial to enhance communication and transparency within the project team. By utilizing the reconstructed schedule, I ensured that everyone, from project managers to execution teams, was informed of the current status and any bottlenecks that needed to be addressed. This facilitated a streamlined approach where all parties involved shared the same expectations and could better anticipate changes.
Wat has been used?
With my contribution, we reshaped the planning of the Pasay Harbor Reclamation project and provided the project team with the tools to make successful progress. This project demonstrates how forensic planning is not only a means to understand past issues but also a crucial step in securing the future of a project.
Building a future on new land together.